MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346520197

Effects of onrab in select non-target wildlife species

2012· article· pt· W2346520197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tricia L. Fry, Kaci K. VanDalen, Colleen Duncan, Kurt C. VerCauteren

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Educação Continuada em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia do CRMV-SP · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRabiesVulpesBiologyVirologyWildlifeRabies vaccineVeterinary medicineSciurusCanisFecesZoologyRabies virusMicrobiologyMedicineEcologyHabitat
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ONRAB® is a recombinant rabies vaccine used to as an oral vaccine in wildlife species such as: fox (Vulpes vulpes), raccoons (Procyon lotor), and striped skunks (Mepthis mephitis). The viral vector in the ONRAB® vaccine is human adenovirus type 5 (Had5) with the gene for rabies glycoprotein incorporated into its genome. Had5 is a relatively safe and well-studied virus, which is used in many vaccine formulations. Canadian researchers (e.g., Knowles et al. 2009) have conducted vaccine efficacy and safety studies using ONRAB® in 18 species of animals. Our research expands on the species previously evaluated. We studied the vaccine as it relates to its safety in wildlife species likely to contact the ONRAB® vaccine during oral rabies vaccine (ORV) campaigns in the United States. We investigated the effects of high doses of the ONRAB® vaccine in wood rats (Neotoma spp.), eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus), Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana), Eastern wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavosilvestri), and fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), whose range overlaps with ORV target species in the United States. After inoculation of the animals we performed realtime PCR on fecal swabs, oral swabs, and tissues to detect viral DNA. Our preliminary results mostly concur with the findings of Knowles et al. (2009). By 7 days postvaccination, turkeys, opossums, and cottontails had all stopped shedding viral DNA. One woodrat and five fox squirrels still had detectable levels of viral DNA in fecal swabs on 7 days post-innoculation. However, 45% of fox squirrels were co-infected with Leptospira interrogans, which may be a confounding factor to the prolonged detection of viral DNA in fecal swabs from these animals. There were no significant findings on gross histology of liver, kidney, small intestine, large intestine, and lung in any of the species studied. We are currently completing PCR analysis of the tissues listed above as well as nasal turbinates. Initial results suggest low likelihood of persistence of ONRAB® in the environment or in individual animals that contact the vaccine. Our preliminary conclusions suggest that non-target species will not be negatively impacted by the distribution of ONRAB® as part of ORV programs in the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Educação Continuada em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia do CRMV-SPSame topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207