Computational Modelling Studies on Stability of Li-S-Se System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent rechargeable batteries are mainly based on conventional lithium intercalation chemistry, using lithium transition metal oxides as cathode material with typical capacities of 120-160 mA.h/g [1]. The low energy density and/ or high cost of these cathode materials have limited their large scale production and application in Li ion batteries. Exploration of new cathode materials is consequently necessary to realise more efficient energy storage systems. Lithium sulphur cells have a promise of providing 2-5 times the energy density of Li-ion cells, however, they suffer poor cycling performance [2]. Improvements that are effected by using Li/SeS x system in different electrolytes have been reported [3]. In the current study we employ computational modelling methods to explore stability, structural and electronic properties of discharge products formed in the Li/SeS x battery, which has potential to offer higher theoretical specific energy and remedies the challenges that Li-S battery encounters. First principle methods were used to calculate thermodynamic properties of Li 2 S and Li 2 Se, which agreed with available experimental results. A cluster expansion technique [4] generated new stable phases of Li/SSe x system and Monte Carlo simulations determined concentration and temperature ranges in which the systems mix. Interatomic Born Meyer potential models for Li 2 S and Li 2 Se were derived and validated and used to explore high temperature structural and transport properties of mixed systems. [1] M.S. Whittingham, Chem. Rev. (2004), 104 , 4271 [2] B. Zhang, X. Qin, G.R. Li and X.P. Gao, Energy Environ. Sci., (2010) 3, 1531 [3] Y. Cui, A. Abouimrane, J. Lu, T. Bolin, Y. Ren, W. Weng, C. sun, V.A. Maroni, S.M. Heald and K. Amine, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2013), 1 35 , 8047. [4] D. Lerch, O Wieckhorst, G.L.W. Hart, R.W. Forcade and S. Muller, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2009), 17 , 055003.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".