MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346580439 · doi:10.29173/cais299

An Exploratory Study Into the Information-Seeking Behaviour of Grade-Three Students

2013· article· fr· W2346580439 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Valerie Nesset

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational Strategies and Epistemologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesExploratory researchPsychologyThe InternetPolitical scienceSociologyLibrary scienceComputer scienceArtWorld Wide WebSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the Internet and new pedagogical methods are introduced into the classroom, young children in the lower grades of elementary school are engaging in multi-source research to support class projects. The proposed phenomenological study is advocated to study the techniques employed by young students when looking for information, the kinds of sources they prefer, how these sources are used, what barriers are confronted, the students’ feelings about the process, and how they can be helped to exploit better the information resources available to them.Depuis que l’Internet et les nouvelles méthodes pédagogiques ont été introduits dans les salles de classe, les jeunes enfants des premières années de l’école primaire effectuent des recherches multi-sources dans le cadre de leurs projets scolaires. L’étude phénoménologique proposée a pour objectif d’étudier les techniques utilisées par les jeunes élèves lorsqu’ils cherchent de l’information, les catégories de ressources qu’ils préfèrent, comment ces ressources sont utilisées, quels inconvénients sont rencontrés, les sentiments ressentis par les...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSISame topicEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesFrench-language works237,207