Gas‐phase mass transfer characteristics in a counter airflow shear rotating packed bed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The gas‐phase mass transfer characteristics in a counter airflow shear rotating packed bed (CAS‐RPB) were studied. The gas volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kyae) was characterized with the physical absorption system NH3‐H2O and the effective interfacial area (ae) was determined by the chemical absorption system CO2‐NaOH, and then the gas‐phase mass transfer coefficient (ky) was obtained. The gas‐phase mass transfer characteristics in the CAS‐RPB were compared with those in the rotating packed bed with split packing (SP‐RPB) under the same operating conditions. The experimental results indicated that the kyae, ae, and ky for counter‐rotation of adjacent packing rings in the CAS‐RPB and SP‐RPB were larger than those for co‐rotation, and the kyae, ae, and ky for counter/co‐rotation in the CAS‐RPB were respectively greater compared with those for counter/co‐rotation in the SP‐RPB. This confirmed that the CAS‐RPB can further intensify the gas‐phase mass transfer process compared to the SP‐RPB. Moreover, the correlative expressions for the kyae, ae, and ky in the CAS‐RPB and SP‐RPB were obtained and were in close agreement with the experimental results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".