MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346656778

Adaptive Management in Canadian Environmental Assessment Law: Exploring Uses and Limitations

2009· article· en· W2346656778 on OpenAlexaffabout
Martin Olszynski

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive managementContext (archaeology)Process (computing)Environmental resource managementResource management (computing)Environmental lawManagement processEnvironmental planningField (mathematics)BusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Environmental management systemComputer scienceProcess managementManagement scienceEngineeringPolitical scienceManagement systemEnvironmental scienceOperations managementLawGeographyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive management is a process-based and experimental approach to environmental management that enables the continuous improvement of management practices by learning about their outcomes. Although most commonly applied in the field of resource management, increasingly it is being applied in the context of project-specific environmental assessment and management, including under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA). In this context, adaptive management is being invoked for its potential to reduce uncertainties associated with proposed mitigation measures so that these can be taken into account when making determinations about a project's likely environmental effects. This article examines the use of adaptive management in this way to date and explores the limitations that CEAA may impose on such use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.103
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.103
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0130.024
Scholarly communication0.0170.009
Open science0.0080.006
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicEnvironmental and Social Impact AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207