Drained and undrained analyses of cylindrical cavity contractions by bounding surface plasticity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops a rigorous semi-analytical approach for drained–undrained cylindrical cavity contraction problems in bounding surface elastoplastic geomaterials. For undrained situations, the effective radial, tangential, and vertical component stresses can be solved directly from the constitutive governing differential equations as an initial value problem, the excess pore pressure subsequently being determined from the radial equilibrium equation. In contrast, for the drained case the Eulerian radial equilibrium equation must be first transformed into an equivalent one in a Lagrangian description via the introduction of an auxiliary variable, then solved together with the elastoplastic constitutive relation for the three stress components as well as the specific volume. It is observed that during drained–undrained contraction processes, plastic deformations occur immediately as a direct result of employing the bounding surface model, so outside the cavity there exists no purely elastic zone. The computed stress distributions and in particular the stress path prediction through an example analysis capture well the anticipated elastoplastic and failure behaviour of the geomaterials surrounding the cavity. The validity and accuracy of the proposed semi-analytical elastoplastic solutions are justified through comparison with ABAQUS numerical results, and their applicability to the tunnel excavation and wellbore drilling problems is also demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it