MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346808472 · doi:10.20986/resed.2016.3466/2016

La "gate control theory" cincuenta años después

2016· article· es· W2346808472 on OpenAlex
Fernando Cerveró

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl (management)ArtComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El 19 de noviembre de 1965 se publicó en la revista científica Science, una de las revistas de mas prestigio en el mundo científico, un artículo de revisión y opinión titulado: “Pain mechanisms: a new theory”, en el que los autores, Ronald Melzack y Patrick Wall, exponían una nueva interpretación de los mecanismos del dolor. Este artículo tuvo y sigue teniendo un impacto considerable entre los profesionales que estudiamos los mecanismos del dolor y sus tratamientos, hasta tal punto que es considerado como uno de los hitos fundamentales de nuestros conocimientos sobre el dolor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it