MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346865163 · doi:10.3928/0022-0124-20001101-06

Postdiploma Nursing Education: After the Year 2000

2000· article· en· W2346865163 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourseworkNursingDemographicsNurse educationHealth careMedical educationMedicinePreferencePsychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of new health care needs related to changing demographics, financial restraints on health care, and increased rates of chronic illness has contributed to the need for nurses with a range of highly specialized skills. Yet traditional education programs for nurses have focused on diploma level preparation for bedside staff positions. This study explores the assessments of 714 clinical nurses with diploma level preparation and 56 nurse managers about the need for postdiploma nursing education. The results reveal a preference for clinically focused university education over noncredit coursework or a generic degree program. Nurses and their managers agree on the necessity for opportunities for more preparation in gerontology and palliative care, as well as the need for all practicing nurses to learn many skills cutting across clinical areas including clinical decision-making, communication, and leadership. Strategies for assisting nurses to access university education including innovative distance education methods are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it