Hereditary hamartomatous gastrointestinal polyposis syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hamartomas represent localized overgrowth of cells in the parts which are normally associated with polyps, ie. mesenhimal, stromal, endodermal and ectodermal elements. Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes carry a significant risk of developing dysplasia, adenomas, gastrointestinal carcinomas, and pancreatic carcinomas. These syndromes may be classified on the basis of whether they represent hereditary syndromes or whether they occur on a sporadic basis. An overlap has been noticed among some of the syndromes. There have been described eight hereditary, and four non-hereditary hamartomatous poly pos syndromes. Hereditary syndromes include: Hereditary juvenile polyposis syndrome, Cowden syndrome, Bannayan-Ruvalcaba-Riley syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, Nevus basal cell syndrome, Hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome, Neurofibromathosis type 1, and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 2B. All of these syndromes are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Non-hereditary syndromes include: Cronkhite-Canada syndrome, hyperplastic polyps, lymphoid polyposis, lymphomatous polyposis. The diagnosis of these syndromes primarily remains a clinical process. Treatment of these patients requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach which includes gastroenterology, pathology, dermatology, surgery, oncology, and genetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".