A Simultaneous Model for Simulating the Propagation of Hydraulic Head in Aquifers with Leakage Pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A three-dimensional simultaneous solution model was developed for analysis of variable transient flows, specifically leakage associated with arbitrary groundwater aquifers. The model simultaneously calculates leakage rates using the hydraulic gradients between coupled leakage points at two leaky aquifers and evaluates the propagation of hydraulic heads in multiple aquifers resulting from that leakage. Important considerations for leakage simulation are variant leakage rates with time and leakage starting time. Two types of leakage pathways are specified in terms of the generated time, including (1) pre-existing leakage pathways and (2) abruptly-induced leakage pathways at specific times. The governing equation with a leakage term is composed of three finite difference equations, and its form depends on whether leakage pathways pre-exist or are induced at specified times according to known or assumed aquifer histories. The developed numerical code was validated by comparison with the results of the TOUGH2/EOS1 program for a three-dimensional conceptual domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".