MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2346946668 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2016.24611

Lean Transformation of the Eye Clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children: Challenging an Implicit Mental Model and Lessons Learned

2016· article· en· W2346946668 on OpenAlexaff
Agnes Wong, David During, Michael Hartman, Stephanie Lappan-Gracon, Melody Hicks, Shiraz Bajwa

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicQuality and Safety in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental modelSick childBest practiceTransformation (genetics)PsychologyMental healthHealth administrationNursingMedicinePsychiatryPediatricsPublic healthManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long patient dwell time (i.e., the time between patients arriving and leaving the clinic) has been a long-standing issue in the eye clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children. By applying the Lean principles of eliminating waste and enhancing flow, we achieved a 26% reduction in the mean patient dwell time over an eight-month period. Importantly, the average time a patient spent with healthcare providers (value-added time) increased from 21% to 31%. In this paper, we summarized our experience by illustrating how an implicit mental model (conscious or unconscious conceptual framework from which we understand the world) pervades in the healthcare system based on deeply held but unexamined assumptions that arise from heuristics (general rules of thumb) and biases; how these assumptions can be tested by objective data; and how we can build a new mental model based on objective findings to improve the healthcare system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.017
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicQuality and Safety in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207