MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347052642 · doi:10.1149/06801.2037ecst

The Effect of Electrode Morphology on Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Performance

2015· article· en· W2347052642 on OpenAlexaff
Jon G. Pharoah, Lisa Handl, Volker Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrodeAgglomerateTriple phase boundaryMaterials scienceSPHERESMorphology (biology)Aspect ratio (aeronautics)Solid oxide fuel cellComposite materialFuel cellsOxideChemical engineeringChemistryElectrolyteMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three different electrode morphologies are generated from three different starting powders, spheres representing non-aggregated powders, agglomerates of spheres and high aspect ratio cylinders modelling splats formed in plasma sprays. Electrodes from each morphology are analysed using finite volumes to predict the effective transport coefficients, the triple phase boundary length and the performance of the electrode. The same structures are also analysed using morphological characterization which can be much more efficient. It was found that high aspect ratio base particles are favourable, and that constrictivity correlates best with the finite volume transport calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207