MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347110650

Big data en gerelateerde begrippen gedefinieerd

2015· article· nl· W2347110650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBig Data Technologies and Applications
Canadian institutionsGnowit (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArtHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De hoeveelheid digitale data is de laatste jaren explosief gegroeid. De afgelopen twee jaar stond het thema ‘Big Data’ (en de daarmee samenhangende Big Data revolutie1) hoog op de agenda van de business en IT-wereld. Ook bij de beleidsmakers en de overheidsorganisaties heeft dit thema nadrukkelijk de aandacht. In de huidige digitale samenleving is de term ‘Big Data’ echter een ‘buzzword’ geworden, waarin ‘data-bergen’ (‘mountains of data’) het traditionele schaarse-data landschap lijken te overvleugelen. Deze data komen uit vele bronnen: GPS, GSM, camera’s, sensoren, websites, sociale media. De enorme groei van de hoeveelheid en diversiteit van digitale data, geeft organisaties steeds meer de mogelijkheid om bijvoorbeeld het gedrag van mensen en bedrijven te monitoren, te duiden en zelfs te voorspellen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0180.020
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.527
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it