MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347155677

Competence as organizer of the training programs: toward a competent performance

2008· article· es· W2347155677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-rph (University of Granada) · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicCompetency Development and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
FundersUniversité du Québec à MontréalUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors of this study are researchers in the Observatory of Educational Reforms (ORE) of the University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM), and they present a theoretical and practice reflection on the use of the competence concept as organizer of curricula. Based on the origin and the application of the concept in the various disciplinary fields that have been used it, they propose a contextualized perspective.Based mainly in the approach of the teaching professional and at the Philippe Jonnaert’s study, since the 1980a, the authors demonstrate that the three pillars for the development of the competency are: situations, competent performance and intelligence of the situations.Finally, after studies carried out in Canada and Niger, the authors illustrate one of them and are allowed to question the content of the currículum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it