MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347161142

An Outline of the Telemetry Systems used by the Tides and Water Levels Department of the Canadian Hydrographic Service

2015· article· en· W2347161142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. Döhler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Hydrographic Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrographyHydrographic surveyTelemetryService (business)Environmental scienceOceanographyGeographyTelecommunicationsMeteorologyRemote sensingEngineeringGeologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the last several years various telemetry systems have been employed by the Marine Sciences Directorate, Environment Canada, to transmit tide and water-level data. Gauging stations along our coasts and in the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River System have been equipped successfully with instruments to obtain real time data for better water management. This paper describes in general terms, the four different systems presently in use, and gives an example of how the data are used in automated hydrographic surveying. Location and approximate capital and operating costs, as well as the man-years required to maintain, modify and to expand the facilities, are shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Hydrographic ReviewSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207