MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347174992 · doi:10.1108/s1745-8862201510

The Future of Global Organizing

2015· book· en· W2347174992 on OpenAlexaff
Rob van Tulder, Alain Verbeke, Rian Drogendijk

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in international business research · 2015
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Business and FDI
Canadian institutionsSolvay (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction : three organizational challenges for multinational enterprises / Rian Drogendijk, Rob van Tulder, Alain Verbeke -- Value generation in the multinational corporation / Francesco Ciabuschi, Henrik Dellestrand, Amalia C. Nilsson -- Corporate parenting styles of the multinational corporation : a subsidiary view / Igor Gurkov -- Progressing the relational perspective on MNCs : beyond headquarters-subsidiary relationships / Dorota Piaskowska ... [et al.] -- Expatriate functions in the current multinational context : moving theory forward / Rochelle Haynes, Phil Almond -- Subsidiary capability upgrading and parent-subsidiary relationship : insights from a Chinese acquisition in the United Kingdom / Shaowei He, Zaheer Khan -- Global organizing : a case from Belarus / Tiia Vissak, Xiaotian Zhang -- How subsidiaries attempt to direct HQ attention to new business opportunities / Desiree Blankenburg Holm, Rian Drogendijk, Hammad ul Haq --

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in international business researchSame topicInternational Business and FDIFrench-language works237,207