Research to Identify Advanced Asphalt Technology to Address Shear Distresses on Airside Facilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taking in to account the widespread application of asphalt pavements for airside infrastructure and the very high shear forces at airport pavements, it is critical that these forces and their affect are carefully considered during the design and construction phase of asphalt materials. This paper describes an ongoing research on shear distresses at airside facilities focused on identifying the primary factors in the pavement design and construction phases that affect the development of these distresses in the asphalt layers in airport pavements and how to address them. Distresses related to application of high shear forces is one of major concerns associated with airfield pavements and has been observed at airports of varying sizes and in varying climates. The recent few examples are Lester B. Pearson International Airport in Toronto, Edmonton International Airport, Halifax International Airport and Quebec International Airport. These particular distressed areas may pose a significant safety hazard and are a challenge for airport operators as well as a continuous economic burden to both airport operators as well as airlines. Due to the complexity of the issue, the current pavement technology does not address it efficiently but rather focuses on short term repairs of the problems areas. In spite of best practices in pavement structural design and construction being followed, distresses that are consistent with existence of very high horizontal and shear forces frequently occur at certain, critical locations on airside pavements (stop bars, sharp turns, rapid exits). These distresses appear to be occurring in spite of the pavement and asphalt mix being structurally adequate to accommodate vertical loads. The research goal is to identify the flexible pavement failure mechanism at high shear areas and through laboratory testing and finite element modelling to identify asphalt mix and other material adjustments that can be made to achieve pavements with sufficient shear resistance. The behaviour of the asphalt materials is being modeled using finite element methodology to evaluate its response to applied shear stresses. The model is then used to evaluate the effect of asphalt mix and materials characteristics on the shear resistance of airfield asphalt mixtures. Finally, a test or tests is being identified that can be used to evaluate the suitability of candidate asphalt mixtures based on their resistance to development of shear distress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".