Rheology and dynamics of Qinling orogenic belt and its grade-separation-style structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The preexistence of Qinling Indosinian Orogenic Belt which widly attracts domestic and oversea geologicians' attentions is a basin-mountain system which formed on the upper crust with most powerful inertial force and is controlled by the E-W strike-slip normal faults and by the process of gravity and latitudinal shear stress derived from gradual variation of the Earth's rotation rate.It is not a channel-arc-basin system formed by subduction.Its orogenic mechanism is that the rigid upper crust's bottom crystalline basement of southern Qinling downcast basin has been subducted under the weak middle crust's plastic layer of northern Qinling rift rising mountain,so it is a intracrust thrust superimposed orogens and not a plate collisional orogenic belt derived from the lithosphere subducting into the asthenosphere.Its power was the meteorite impact which had formed a 100km diameter impact crater before 212 Ma in Ontario,Canadian.It is not mantle convection that drives plates drifting and colliding,but the strong horizontal compression from south to north derived from the Earth's rotation rate sharply slowing down caused by the meteorite impact.Its ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic belt was caused by intracrust subduction dynamical effect and not by continent crust subducting in 100 km-deep-temperature-pressure condition.Its grade-separation-style structure was the result which the anomaly Earth's mantle responsed to the gravity unbalancing caused by new different orientation meso-cenozoic block basins on the upside crust,and not the non-coupling relation between the mantle plume active uplifting and primary W-E orogenic belt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".