MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347353226

Riflessioni filosofiche sul metodo Rességuier

2016· preprint· it· W2347353226 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il metodo Rességuier presenta degli aspetti di grande interesse teorico che implicano un ripensamento dei concetti cardine su cui si basa l’idea di cura e di terapia. Con questo scritto intendo analizzarli per sommi capi in modo tale da approfondire le basi filosofiche su cui tale metodo sembra riposare. Questa analisi ha come obiettivo da una parte un approfondimento del metodo che porti ad una migliore comprensione della sua pratica, dall’altra una riflessione che, partendo dal metodo stesso, vada a interrogarsi sulle idee filosofiche che sono da sempre state alla base della medicina. [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0300.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it