MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2347359127

The U.S.-Mexico Trucking Dispute and Its Implications

2015· article· en· W2347359127 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
WU Fen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDispute resolutionInternational tradePoliticsDispute boardBusinessDispute mechanismTerritorial disputeAlternative dispute resolutionPolitical scienceInternational economicsEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The U.S.-Mexico trucking dispute is a trade dispute concerning Mexican truckers' s right to provide cross-border truck transportation services in the U.S. according to NAFTA. The process of resolving this dispute lasted for almost 16 years. It fully demonstrats the great influence of the interest groups in the forming of foreign trade policies of the U.S. What's more, it also highlights thepragmatismattitude towards the international law of the U.S. and reflects the characteristic of domestic political game in the formulation of foreign trade policy. However, the final resolution of this dispute provides a useful reference to the modern world on how to deal with the increasing conflicts on trade-related social issues in the multilateral trade system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.301
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.058 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business Research→Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→