MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347409294

The Effects of Knowledge Intensive Business Services on the Competitive Advantage of China’s Manufacturing Sector

2013· article· en· W2347409294 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetitive advantageBusinessIndustrial organizationManufacturingChinaService (business)Production (economics)Manufacturing sectorTertiary sector of the economyCommerceMarketingEconomicsMicroeconomicsInternational economics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As advanced elements,KIBS are embedded in the production and play an important role in shipping competitive advantage of manufacturing.This paper uses panel corrected standard error(PCSE) method to analyze the complex effects of Chinese KIBS on the competitive advantage of manufacturing.The results suggest that Chinese KIBS have obvious negative impact on competitive advantage of labor-intensive industries;while they have very significantly positive promoting effect on that of technology-intensive manufacturing;at the same time,they almost have no effect on competitive advantage of capital-intensive manufacturing.In addition,each KIBS sector has different effects on competitive advantage of manufacturing.Scientific research service and telecommunications computer information services have significantly positive impact on competitive advantage of manufacturing.Financial service has asymmetric effects on different kinds of industries.As for business services,it has obvious negative impact on competitive advantage of all types of manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207