MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347477943

Effects of the Stagger Angles of Vaned Diffuser on Flow Field and Performance of a High-speed Centrifugal Compressor

2013· article· en· W2347477943 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Technology and Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentrifugal compressorDiffuser (optics)Gas compressorMechanicsNozzleFlow (mathematics)Isentropic processMaterials sciencePhysicsImpellerEngineeringAerospace engineeringOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The numerical simulation of three-dimensional viscous flow was carried out to investigate the effects of different diffuser stagger angle on flow field and performance of a high-speed centrifugal compressor.The numerical results indicated that the influence of different stagger angles on flow filed and performance of the centrifugal compressor is great.Too small stagger angle will cause flow channel blockage and Laval nozzle effect which greatly reduce the compressor efficiency.As the stagger angle which is in a appropriate range increases,the compressor's total pressure ratio and isentropic efficiency increased,but its surge margin is gradually reduced.In short,the stagger angle of vaned diffuser should be determined by efficiency,pressure ratio and surge margin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.001
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it