MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347582950

Threat Level Assessment Based on Fuzzy Bayesian Networks

2014· article· en· W2347582950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ding Da-l

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Optics & Control · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayesian networkAzimuthFuzzy logicBattlefieldBayesian probabilityData miningSoftwareSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceFuzzy setArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at the uncertainty of Threat Level Assessment( TLA) data sources under modern complex battlefield,a fuzzy Bayesian network TLA method was proposed by integrating the fuzzy set theory into Bayesian networks. After well considering about the effect of the distance and azimuth angle of threat sources relative to a UCAV on its stealth capability,the threat level was evaluated by integrating such uncertain factors as weather,threat type,distance and azimuth angle based on randomization of uncercain knowledge. Then a TLA Bayesian network was established by adopting Netica software of the Norsys Software Company in Canada,and simulation was carried out. The simulation results show that the method can assess the threat level rapidly and accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics Optics & ControlSame topicAdvanced Decision-Making TechniquesFrench-language works237,207