MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2347625999

Statistical analysis study of 8 kinds of sensory indexes in the entry grain

2014· article· en· W2347625999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ren Chun-shen

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical engineer · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatistical analysisStatisticsMathematicsRegression analysisSensory systemStatistical hypothesis testingCorrelationBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the process of study sensory indexes in entry grains,SPSS has strong applicability.Based on the study of the sensory indexes in barleys in Ningbo port as an example,introduces the application of SPSS in statistical description,normal distribution test,regression and correlation analysis,cluster analysis and factor analysis in detail.The analysis results show that most of 8 kinds of sensory indexes in the imported barleys are accord with normal distribution characteristics,and the abnormal value in barleys is relatively concentrated to Canada,the de-gree of correlation between moisture and other indexes(germination、protein and test weight)is higher,at the same time,the barleys are classified according to the factor comprehensive scores,it provides a certain reference for the import barleys and rational utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical engineerSame topicRegional Economic and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207