Study on Grain Yield and Growth Characteristics of Different Japonica Rice Cultivars in Chaohu City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to study the adaptability,grain yield and stress resistance of stripes disease resistant cultivars of South Japonica 44 and Ningjing No.3 in Chaohu city,with Wuyunjing No.7,a native high-yield rice cultivar as ck,and to explore the optimal nitrogen level and sowing date.The results showed that the average grain yield of Ningjing No.3 was 9067kg/hm2,alone in Wuyunjing No.7 of the 9471kg/hm2,the average output of South Japonica 44 was slightly lower than 8338kg/hm2.The growth stages of three japonica rice cultivars were very similar,growed well and with resistance to common diseases of rice.So,it could conclud that Ningjing No.3 and South Japonica 44 were high-quality rice cultivars,and suitable for the growth in Chaohu city.The experiment also suggested that the optimal N application rate was 240kg/hm for Ningjing No.3 and South Japonica 44,and the sowing date was May 15 to May 25.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".