Comparative Study of the Three-phase Fluidized Gas Desulfurization by Use of Limestone Slurry and Lime Slurry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the help of a hot state test rig for processing flue gas with a flow rate of 2000 Nm 3/h a comparative study was performed of fluidized gas desulfurization through numerous tests by using limestone slurry and lime slurry. The results of tests show that in case of the slurry pH value between 5-8, and the insertion depth of a spray tube at 160～200 mm (the corresponding pressure drop of the spray device being 150～190 mm water) the spray speed will be around 10～25 m/s and the circulation rate, 3. With the slurry concentration at below 7% through a stirring and forced oxidation of reaction products a desulfurization efficiency of more than 95% can be attained if lime is used as a desulfurizing agent. With limestone serving as a desulfurizing agent a desulfurization efficiency of in excess of 75% may result, and this efficiency can be increased to above 90% if an additive of organic acid is also utilized in addition to the limestone desulfurizing agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".