Observation on the Efficacy of Shoulder Three-needle Acupuncture plus Neck Jiaji Points in Treating Shoulder Periarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy of shoulder three-needle acupuncture plus neck Jiaji Points in treating shoulder periarthritis.Method A hundred patients with shoulder periarthritis were randomly allocated into a treatment group and a control group,50 in each.The treatment group received shoulder three-needle acupuncture plus neck Jiaji points and the control group received shoulder three-needle acupuncture only.The McGill Pain Questionnaire(MPQ) was adopted in evaluation before and after treatment.Result The recovery and markedly effective rate was 92.0% in the treatment group,versus 74.0% in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).After treatment,the scores in the treatment group evaluated by MPQ were markedly different from that in the control group(P0.05).Conclusion Shoulder three-needle acupuncture plus neck Jiaji points is effective in treating shoulder periarthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".