MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348548674

Technical Economy Comparison Analysis of Steel Beam Connection Types for Super High-Rise Hybrid Structures

2013· article· en· W2348548674 on OpenAlexaff
Wentao Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJianzhu gangjiegou jinzhan · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Canadian institutionsCanadian Council on International Law
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutriggerStructural engineeringConnection (principal bundle)Core (optical fiber)Beam (structure)EngineeringSteel frameFrame (networking)Mechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comparing study for the effect of steel floor beam connection types on the structural behavior, construction time needed and cost of hybrid structures with strengthened story is conducted based on an actual project of 52-storey and 224.8 m high.The result shows that steel beams should be pinned at both ends or pinned with concrete core and rigidly connected with perimeter frame columns in super high-rise hybrid structures.Outrigger of strengthened story may work together with concrete core tube, being part of a new lateral load resisting system of outrigger-core tube.Scheme of pinned connection at both ends can save the cost about ten percent than rigid connection one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJianzhu gangjiegou jinzhanSame topicSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall BuildingsFrench-language works237,207