MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348555218

Robust face recognition based on low frequency DCT coefficients retransforming optimized by CLAHE

2014· article· en· W2348555218 on OpenAlexaff
Yibin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Engineering and Applications Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive histogram equalizationDiscrete cosine transformPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceHistogramFacial recognition systemClassifier (UML)Histogram equalizationKernel (algebra)Contrast (vision)Computer visionMathematicsImage (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of face recognition is seriously impacted by illumination,expression,posture and occlusion variations,for which low frequency Discrete Cosine Transform(DCT)coefficients retransforming based on Contrast Limiting Adaptive Histogram Equalization(CLAHE)is proposed.Original images are divided into some non-overlapping patches and CLAHE is used to do local contrast stretching so as to reduce noise.Illustration variation of face image is removed by reducing suit numbers of low frequency DCT coefficients.Kernel principle component analysis is used to extract features.Nearest neighbor classifier is used to finish classification and recognition.The effectiveness and reliability of proposed algorithm have been verified by experiments on ORL,extended YaleB and AR face database.Experimental results show that proposed algorithm has higher recognition accuracy than several advanced standardized technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Engineering and Applications JournalSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207