MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348651467

File Server Technique Based on P2P

2005· article· en· W2348651467 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBitTorrentInternet Authentication ServiceFile Transfer ProtocolAppleShareOperating systemServer farmComputer networkThe InternetWindows ServerFile serverProtocol (science)Client–server modelApplication serverServer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrcatP2P protocol is not as traditional network system,it has not the concept of server and client.The P2P protocol is very useful today.The user count of Internet rise fast in recent years and the connection speed become faster and faster by the popularization of the ADSL and the Broad Band network.Comparing to this the capacity of HTTP Server and FTP Server can't keep up with the demand of Internet.This paper designs a new type of file server based on P2P.Not like the Bittorrent and ED2K P2P server,it can replace the FTP server in all time.It needn't very powerful computer to be a server and its performance will not reduce when too many user connect to it.We design and test the server.Its performance is acceptable even if use a slow machine to be the server.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it