Preliminary Evaluation on Therapy on the Effectiveness of Herpes Zoster Neuralgia with Celecoxib Capsules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To explore the curative effect of celecoxib capsules on the herpes zoster neuralgia. Method: Eighty-six cases of patients with Herpes zoster neuralgia were divided into two groups, the observation group(n=46) was given celecoxib capsules, and the control group(n=40) was given Ibuprofen. Result: The clinical effective rate of the observation group and the control group were 82.6%, 62.5% respectively, and the difference between the two groups were statistically significant(P0.05). After the treatment of 2 weeks, the VAS and McGill scores between two groups had significantly difference, the curative effect of the observation group was better than the control group, and the difference between the two groups were statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion: Celebrex contributes is an effective drug for the treatment of herpes zoster neuralgia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".