MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348697159

Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination index of seven canadian naked oat varieties

2011· article· en· W2348697159 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pengcheng He

Bibliographic record

VenueGanhan diqu nongye yanjiu · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationSalt (chemistry)HorticultureDegree (music)BiologyAgronomyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A germinative test of soaking 7 oats seeds from Canada in different concentration of saltsolution composed by Na2SO4、NaCl and so on.The results showed that: under the stress of complex salts,the germination postponed and lengthened,germination ability、germination energy、germination index and simple activity index of 7 oats seeds reduced in different degree with the increase of salt concentration,but the salt injury index increased and there were significant or highly significant differences between different varieties.With the increase of the concentration of complex salts,the inhibition degree to the germination increased.Different oat varieties have various semi-lethal and whole-lethal concentrations.Among these seven naked oat varieties,Canadian 9 has the highest semi-lethal and whole-lethal concentration,with 2.6% and 3.8% respectively;while Canadian 8 has the minimum semi-lethal and whole-lethal concentration,with 1.4% and 2.4%.As the regression analysis illustrated,the consequence of ability to tolerant mixed salt stress among seven Canadian naked oat varieties was asfollow,Canadian 9Canadian 7Canadian 10Canadian 3Canadian 6、Canadian 5Canadian 8.And,the conductivity can be used as a simple indicator to test salt tolerance of oat seed,the salt injury index can be used an an indicator to judge the danger degree of oat seed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGanhan diqu nongye yanjiuSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207