MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348749121

Hume's Utility Theory of Virtue

2008· article· en· W2348749121 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Beijing Normal University · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtueJudgementMeaning (existential)Epistemic virtueEpistemologyValue (mathematics)Function (biology)PhilosophyCharacter (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)Property (philosophy)Computer scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtue is a quality,namely the specialty,usefulness,and function that all things bear.It is a character for man,but a property for thing.Before Hume,the western scholars in ethnics generally emphasize virtue for its own sake,which hence becomes the universal meaning people pursue,meaning that is called the inner goodness of virtue.Hume,however,differs in that the true value of virtue lies in its outer good,that is,the function of quality to others or society.Virtue for him is no longer a good for its own sake only;rather,the good of virtue is a result.It is for this reason that Hume changed the western tradition of ethnics.For him,judgement of value should be separated from judgement of fact for their due roles,an advocacy that leads the focus of discussion to the utilityor usefulnessof virtue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it