MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348830449

Experiment of Safe and High-efficient Mining Method for No.2 Orebody in Huangshilao Area

2008· article· en· W2348830449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonferrous Metals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsFirst Quantum Minerals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiggingMining engineeringWork (physics)Deformation (meteorology)GeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No.2 orebody was initially mined with sublevel caving method in Huangshilao area.Due to fragmentized rock,excessive interlayer and diversified orebody,a series of difficulties occur during the process of mining,such as hard digging in laneway,hole deformation and difficult charging etc.In addition,sublevels are many,the engineering of mining preparation is large,support work is difficult,above problems restrict the production capacity of mine.Based on above difficulties,the stope structure parameter of No.2 orebody in Huangshilao area,as well as preliminary mining project disposal,excavate equipment,hole disposal etc.,are tested,mining project adapting to No.2 orebody is formed to ensure the producing continuity and stability of the mine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it