MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2348895264

Study on goat and rabbit's pregnancy and their foetus growth by using ultrasonotomography

2000· article· en· W2348895264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Luoyang Agricultural College · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFetusPregnancyReflexAnatomyMedicineBiologyPhysiologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observation was made on milk goat rabbit's pregnancy and their foetus growth by using animal used AMI 900 supersonic diagnostic set and 5MH z linear finder made in Canada.Goat:on the 2lst day of pregnancy,embryonic vesicle is found;on the 23rd day,embryonic body reflex appears; on the 24th day,there is heart pulsation;on the 40th day,the head and body can be seen clearly;on the 42nd day,foetus skull appears reflex and the foetus has movement;on the 45th day of pregnancy,foetus skull has obvious reflex;on the 50th day,the inherent shape of the head is comparatively clear;on the 53rd day,foetus movement is obvious ,the head and neck,the four limbs and rib have clear outline ,the foetus body is 3.6~3.8cm long;on the 60th day,it's 3.9~4.3cm long,and on the 70th ady,the length of the foetus body is 4.7~5.6cm.Rabbit's early pregnancy and foetus body changing:on the 8th day of pregnancy,embryonic vesicle is found,during the first 14 days of pregnancy,embryonic vesicle grows averagely 0.1cm per day;on the 17th day of pregnancy ,foetus body appears reflex; on the 18th day ,the backbone and heartbeat can be seen;on the 20th day,the outlines of the head and body are comparatively clear,the foetus body is roughly 0.78×0.89cm 2 and has foetus movement,heart pulsates obviously, during 15~20 days of pregnancy,embryonic vesicle grows averagely 0.15cm per day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Luoyang Agricultural CollegeSame topicRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, HealthFrench-language works237,207