MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349041560

A Real-time Scheduling Based on Branch-Bound Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network

2008· article· en· W2349041560 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Genke Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkScheduling (production processes)AlgorithmSequence (biology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Upper and lower boundsArtificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a scheduling method based on branch-bound algorithm and artificial neural network for solving Shuanghuan Polishing Lutting Workshop's scheduling problem. In this method, branch bound algorithm is used to find a sequence for m jobs. After enough sequences are obtained, those sequences are utilized as training examples to train neural network. Then, a matrix called neural network matrix is obtained. In the real production environment, n (nm) jobs, are divided into several small group. As to each small group, neural network master matrix is used to find m jobs' sequence. Finally, each group is regarded as a whole and Palmer algorithm is used to find the final sequence of n jobs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207