The Correlation between Cognitive Impairment after Cerebral Infarction and the Recovery of Neurological Function of Patients with Cerebral Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between cognitive impairment and the recovery of neurological function in patients with cerebral infarction.Methods: Two hundred and eleven cases of acute cerebral infarction were enrolled and divided into no cognitive impairment group and cognitive impairment group based on Mont-real Cognitive Assessment(MoCA).Barthel Index(BI) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) score for all participants at enrollment and 3 months after strokes were documented and analyzed.Results: At enrollment and month 3,in the no-cognitive impairment group the NIHSS scores was lower and the BI scores higher than those in the cognitive impairment group(P0.05).The MoCA scores was negatively correlated with NIHSS scores and positively correlated with BI scores(P0.05).Conclusion: Cognitive impairment after cerebral infarction will obstruct the recovery of neurological function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".