MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349054382

The Correlation between Cognitive Impairment after Cerebral Infarction and the Recovery of Neurological Function of Patients with Cerebral Infarction

2013· article· en· W2349054382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yang Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Injury and Functional Reconstruction · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCognitive impairmentCerebral infarctionCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentBarthel indexStroke (engine)InfarctionInternal medicinePhysical therapyCardiologyActivities of daily livingPsychiatryIschemiaMyocardial infarction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To assess the association between cognitive impairment and the recovery of neurological function in patients with cerebral infarction.Methods: Two hundred and eleven cases of acute cerebral infarction were enrolled and divided into no cognitive impairment group and cognitive impairment group based on Mont-real Cognitive Assessment(MoCA).Barthel Index(BI) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) score for all participants at enrollment and 3 months after strokes were documented and analyzed.Results: At enrollment and month 3,in the no-cognitive impairment group the NIHSS scores was lower and the BI scores higher than those in the cognitive impairment group(P0.05).The MoCA scores was negatively correlated with NIHSS scores and positively correlated with BI scores(P0.05).Conclusion: Cognitive impairment after cerebral infarction will obstruct the recovery of neurological function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeural Injury and Functional ReconstructionSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207