MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349104548

Synthesis, Structure and Biological Activity of 3-Methyl-4-(3-nitrobenzylideneamino)-5-ethoxycarbonyl-methylsulfanyl-1,2,4-triazole

2015· article· en· W2349104548 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Qing

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Structural Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMonoclinic crystal systemSchiff baseTriazole1,2,4-TriazoleBiological activityProton NMRStereochemistryCrystallographyCrystal structureBase (topology)Medicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistryIn vitro
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Schiff base was synthesized by 3-methyl-4-amino-5-ethoxycarbonyl-methylsulfanyl-1,2,4-triazole with 3-nitrobenzaldehyde. The structure was confirmed by 1H NMR, IR, H RMS, TGA techniques and X-ray diffraction. The crystal belongs to monoclinic system, space group P21/c, with a = 8.965(2), b = 21.903(5), c = 9.197(2) A, β = 114.011(4)°, C14H15N5O4 S, Mr = 349.08, V = 1649.7(6) A3, Dc = 1.407 g·cm-3, Z = 4, F(000) = 728, μ = 0.226 mm-1, the final R = 0.0574 and wR = 0.1336 for 2932 unique reflections with I 2σ(I). Furthermore, the biological activity to four vegetable pathogens has been tested. The title compound exhibits better biological activity to four vegetable pathogens compared to the Schiff base without 5-ethoxycarbonyl and to Gibberlla saubinetti in EC95 compared with triadimefon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Structural ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207