MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349158678

The Exhalative-sedimentary Evidence of the Bainiuchang Ag-polymetallic Deposit,Yunnan,China:Constraints from Geochemistry of Host-rocks

2010· article· en· W2349158678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
GU De-min

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistrySedimentary rockHydrothermal circulationTourmalineMineralization (soil science)Banded iron formationOre genesisFluid inclusionsPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studying if there took place extensive exhalative-sedimentary activities in the southeast Yunnan Province has been one of key factors to constrain origin of the Gejiu,Bainiuchang,and Dulong polymetallic deposits.The authors systematically study the geochemistry characteristics of host-rocks in the Bainiuchang Ag-polymetallic deposit in this paper.The host-rocks have the same distribution area with the sea-floor volcano or hot-water origin chert.Then normalized REE distribution patterns of host-rocks can be divided into two groups: One group with higher total REE contents indicates more normal sediments attendance.The other group with lower total REE contents possesses the similar normalized REE distribution patterns and parameters with rich-tourmaline banded hydrothermal sediments in the Canada Sullivan deposit and banded chert in iron-bearing formations in the Canada Agnico-Eugle deposit.And the pairs of trace elements show the similar characteristics with modern sea-floor hydrothermal sediments.In addition,the contents of As,Sb and Ag are similar with that of chert in the Dachang and the Gejiu mining districts.Based on above of all,it is indicated that the Bainiuchang Ag-polymetallic deposit is exhalative-sedimentary origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscienceSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207