MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349230371

Annual and seasonal variation characteristics of NDVI and its relationship with meteorological factors in Jialing River Basin

2013· article· en· W2349230371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dazhong Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hohai University · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Changes in China
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexSunshine durationEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationClimatologyAir temperatureStructural basinVegetation (pathology)SeasonalityLagSpring (device)Trend analysisQuarter (Canadian coin)Atmospheric sciencesMeteorologyGeographyClimate changeGeologyOceanographyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variation of the normalized difference vegetation index(NDVI) and its relationship with precipitation,air temperature,and sunshine duration in the Jialing River Basin during the period from 1982 to 2006 were studied using statistical methods.The results show that the annual average NDVI had an increasing trend during the study period,especially in the spring,and it was highly correlated with temperature.In all seasons,there was a lag in the change of the seasonal average NDVI when the air temperature and precipitation changed in the basin,especially in the vegetation growth seasons: spring,summer,and autumn.In the spring,the relationships between the average NDVI and the sunshine duration in the present quarter and the air temperature in the previous quarter were more significant.During the summer,the average NDVI was significantly influenced by meteorological factors of both the present quarter and the previous quarter.During the autumn,the average NDVI was significantly correlated with sunshine duration and was greatly influenced by the air temperature in the previous quarter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hohai UniversitySame topicEnvironmental Changes in ChinaFrench-language works237,207