Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Massive Polyposis Causing Proptosis Requiring Craniofacial Resection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common health problem in the Western world. CRS is classified as CRS with (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP) nasal polyps. A less common third type is allergic fungal sinusitis, which often presents with polyps and, not infrequently, skull base erosion. Most patients are successfully managed with maximal medical therapy or endoscopic approaches. There are currently no reports of CRSwNPs resulting in fibro-osseous thickening and proptosis in the English literature. As such, the authors report a case of a 33-year-old man who underwent a craniofacial resection with drilling of the hyperostosed bone, which led to resolution of the proptosis and nasal symptoms. In an era where endoscopic surgery is the standard surgical approach for CRSwNP, this case highlights the need for open skullbase approaches for this condition due to the extensive and recalcitrant nature of the disease. While the majority of patients can be dealt with endoscopically, the authors highlight the importance of having the open approach in the otolaryngologists' armamentarium for patients of recalcitrant and extensive CRSwNP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".