MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349343543

Experimental Investigation on Influence of Injection Angle of Burners on Aerodynamical Field in W Shaped Flame Boiler

2001· article· en· W2349343543 on OpenAlexaff
He Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoiler (water heating)Pulverized coal-fired boilerAnemometerCombustorCombustionMaterials scienceCombustion chamberSecondary air injectionCoalMechanicsNuclear engineeringMetallurgyEnvironmental scienceWaste managementTurbulenceChemistryEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cool state experimental investigation has been made in a model of the 360 MW W shaped flame boiler,measuring flow field in the boiler with a hot wire anemometer,and studies of regularity on influence of injection angle of burners on aerodynamical field in boiler is made in this paper.It is manifested that the action of prima air and secondary air washing out front and rear walls (water cooling walls) of furnace can b dropped evidently,meantime,the scouring velocity and angle of high temperature gas against throat,front and rear arches of chamber of furnace can also be decreased along with the decrease of injection angle of burners,so that high temperature corrosion of water cooling walls can be efficiently protected and the degree of clinker in these positions can be alleviated.But the gas downward route in the chamber of furnace shall be shortened,this isnt beneficial to complete combustion of pulverized coal injected into chamber of furnace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207