MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2349375873

Silicon-Based Millimeter-Wave Coplanar Waveguide Scalable Model Based on Atificial Neural Network

2012· article· en· W2349375873 on OpenAlexaff
Zhang Qi-jun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microwaves · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoplanar waveguideExtremely high frequencyArtificial neural networkMicrowaveMicroelectronicsSiliconWaveguideOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringScalabilityIntegrated circuitCMOSComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the develepment of microelectronics technology,the cut-off frequency of the silicon-based CMOS devices has reached the millimeter-wave band.It makes it possible to realize silicon-based microwave monolithic integrated circiuts.Therefore,it becomes necessary to establish the model of silicon-based millimeter-wave coplanar waveguide for accurate design of silicon microwave monolithic integrated circuits.Silicon-based millimeter-wave coplanar waveguide(CPW) scalable model based on neural network technique is proposed in this paper.A three-layers neural network structure is used.Neural network is adopted to learn the mapping between the geometrical variables and S parameter of the coplanar waveguide from measured results of CPW.Comparison of simulation and measurement results shows that CPW scalable models based on neural network can provide accurate and fast prediction of the S parameters of CPW for differential physical sizes as variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Microwaves→Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→