The Chinese Version of the Observer Alexithymia Scale:Reliability and Validity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To develop a Chinese version of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS) and examine its reliability and validity. Methods: A sample of 468 under-graduate students was administered OAS.The internal reliability and test-retest reliability were examined, and using confirmatory factor analysis,a five-factor model was tested. Results: The Cronbach's a coefficient of the OAS was 0.84; The range of mean interitem correlation coefficients was 0.20～0.45; The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.90; The correlation coefficients of the five factors with the total scale score were 0.52～0.75,and the correlation coefficients among the five factors were 0.01～0.55; The GFI(0.952)、CFI(0.943)、IFI(0.944)、REMEA(0.069)all met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit. Conclusion: the Chinese version of the OAS is a reliable and valid measure for assessing alexithymia in Chinese-speaking sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".