MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349452885

Impacts and Significance of Gathering Strength on Canadian Aboriginal Peoples’Capacity Building

2013· article· en· W2349452885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang Hong-ya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chuxiong Normal University · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipDevolution (biology)Action planCapacity buildingPlan (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Action (physics)Political scienceEconomic growthPublic administrationBusinessEnvironmental planningGeographyEconomicsManagementFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gathering Strength: Canada’s Aboriginal Action Plan which was released on January 7,1998,responded to Aboriginal peoples’will and needs.It is aimed at capacity building from four aspects of: renewing the partnership,recognizing and strengthening First Nations governments,establishing equitable and sustainable fiscal relationships,and supporting stronger First Nations communities and people.As an essential component of devolution,the Action Plan proves to be a valuable step and option adopted by Aboriginals towards self-government.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chuxiong Normal UniversitySame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207