MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349493172

Study of face recognition event-related potential in Parkinson's disease patients

2010· article· en· W2349493172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua laonian xin-nao-xueguanbing zazhi · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvanced Computing and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent-related potentialNeuropsychologyAudiologyElectroencephalographyMedicineCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentLatency (audio)Cognitive impairmentStatistical significanceInternal medicinePsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To study changes of N170 component of event-related potential in PD patients with impairment of visuospatial function and investigate methods of detecting cognitive impairment in the early stage of PD.Methods Fifty PD patients participated in the study.All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for PD proposed by the Queen Square Brain Bank.They were assessed by neuropsychological scales,and were divided into impairment in visuospatial function (group Ⅰ ,n = 30) and normal visuospatial function(group Ⅱ ,n = 20).The face learning-recognition experimental model was used.EEG data of 10 channels were recorded and face-specific N170 component in all subjects was measured.In addition,reaction time and correct reaction rate were recorded.Statistical analysis was applied to peak latency and amplitude of N170,behavioral indexes and scores of neuropsychological scale in the two groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences in scores of MMSE between the two groups.The scores of MoCA of the group Ⅰ were lower than those of the group Ⅱ.Correct reaction rate in group Ⅰ was much lower than that in group Ⅱ (P0.05).The wave amplitudes of N170 evoked by familiar face event in only T6 electrode in group Ⅰ was increased as compared with that in group Ⅱ (P 0.05). There was statistical difference between peak latency or amplitude of N170 evoked by familiar face event and strange face event in F7,F8,O1 and T5 electrodes in group Ⅰ .Conclusion MoCA can identify cognitive function impairment in PD patients in early stage.The method of face recognition has clinical value in detecting impairment of visuospatial function in PD patient.N170 is insensitive for detecting impairment of visuospatial function in face recognition stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it