MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2349601380

Present status of oil shale resource utilization in the world and its development prospects

2012· article· en· W2349601380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
FU Bao-shan

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal geology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleShale oilTight oilUnconventional oilOil reservesEconomic shortageShale oil extractionChinaResource (disambiguation)Fossil fuelGeologyPetroleum engineeringNatural resource economicsShale gasShell in situ conversion processOil shale gasSynthetic crudePetroleumWaste managementGeographyEconomicsPaleontologyEngineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because of the increasing of oil price and the shortage of conventional oil and gas resources,the oil shale of unconventional oil and gas resources may become the important oil complementary and alternative energy in the 21th century due to its rich resources,its economy and its feasibility of development and utilization.Approximately 70% of the proven reserves of the world's shale oil resources converted by oil shale is distributed in the United States followed by China,Russia,Brazil,Canada,Jordan,Australia and Estonia,etc.,while over 85% oil shale of China is in Jilin,Liaoning and Guangdong provinces.Along with the increasing attention on the development and utilization of oil shale,the oil shale reserves,shale oil production and economic value of oil shale have showed the growth trend,and the support of corresponding policy have also increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal geology→Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→