MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349746675

Pharmcoeconomics of Overseas Pharmaceutical Enterprise and its Use for Reference

2005· article· en· W2349746675 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Universitatis Medicinalis Nanjing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharmacoeconomicsPromotion (chess)Pharmaceutical industryBusinessProcess (computing)Computer scienceMedicinePolitical sciencePharmacologyIntensive care medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article introduces the pharmcoeconomics of overseas pharmaceutical enterprises by analyzing the pressure of the environment and the needs of the enterprise. The main contents and method of the pharmacoeconomics research are also introduced. It primarily analyzes the pharmacoeconomics of the Canadian international pharmaceutical enterprises. By its use for reference, the author suggests that the Chinese pharmaceutical enterprise use pharmacoeconomics research for their business. The pharmacoeconomics can at least play an important role in the new drug RD decision-making process, pricing and promotion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Universitatis Medicinalis NanjingSame topicIntellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisFrench-language works237,207