MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349901906

PHASE ANALYSIS OF COPPER IN THE SOIL CONTAINING COPPER

2001· article· en· W2349901906 on OpenAlex
Huilin Tao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeoscience and Mining Technology
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopperChemistryCopper sulfideSoil testPhase (matter)MetallurgyInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceSoil waterGeologySoil scienceOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To research the occurrence state of copper in the soil containing copper and the phase analysis method of the copper. It was shown that using ethylenediamine 0.05 mol/L(pH=10) to soak out free copper oxidie, the bonded copper oxide was soaked out by H 2SO 4(0.9 mol/L) solution containing Na 2SO 3 and NH 4HF 2 and secondary sulfide copper by HCl(1.0 mol/L) solution containing thiarea. In the optimum condition, the method has been applied to phase analysis of copper in the soil containing copper and standard ores recovery test with satisfactory results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeoscience and Mining TechnologyFrench-language works237,207