MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2349988607

Distribution characteristics of light intensity in 8 ring cavity

2013· article· en· W2349988607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransducer and Microsystem Technologies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsLight beamLight intensityIntensity (physics)Gaussian beamPhysicsRADIUSBeam (structure)GaussianRayPosition (finance)Light fieldMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on theory of light 2 × 2 transmission matrix,characteristic parameters and electric field vector equation of Gaussian beams in general ring cavity of four frequency differential laser gyro are established mechanism of light wave transmission in 8 ring empty and quartz crystal cavity is further discussed,on this basis,including propagation a circle,the Gaussian beams maximum light intensity,light spot radius size and light intensity space distribution by beam waist place and general position as a starting location. The results show that light waves transmit a circle can obtain maximum light intensity 7. 9837 × 106,the smallest light spot radius0. 353 9 mm on the cross section when the beam waist position O1as a starting location for the whole quartz crystal cavity,therefore,this place is the best installation location of active medium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it